To analyze the affects of income to demands for fruit , the article estimates that the income elasticity of demand is 0 . 45 in urban and 0 . 52 in rural instead 然后利用截面數(shù)據(jù),實證分析了收入對中國城鄉(xiāng)水果需求的影響,測算出城鄉(xiāng)水果需求收入彈性分別為0 . 45和0 . 52 。
The studying conclusions are as following : first , the time - sequence analysis of consumption composition of urban and rural households shows that : ( 1 ) the long - term marginal propensity to consume ( mfc ) of rural households in jiangxi province is bigger than that of households in urban ; ( 2 ) the income elasticity of demand of rural households on such goods as transportation and communication 縱向時間序列( 1990 2000年)的分析結(jié)果表明:第一,江西農(nóng)村居民的長期邊際消費傾向大于城鎮(zhèn)居民;第二,農(nóng)村居民的需求收入彈性在交通通訊、文教娛樂、醫(yī)療保健、其它等方面大于1 ,反映出他們對這些類商品的需求旺盛。
Therefore , the paper expanded eles , namely , turned the above assumption into the following : all the consumers in the same income level have the identical marginal budget share or the identical marginal propensity to consume when consuming certain goods , but consumers in different income level have not and the paper , by defining and introducing the nominal variable of income level - a variable of the marginal propensity to consume only resulting from the change of consumers " ( rural residents ) income level , with which the standard income level was compared , adopted to expand again the extended eles model , exploited the surveying household data in 2001 by liaoning statistics bureau , caculated ( 1 ) the marginal propensity to consume , real expenditure structure , real propensity to consume and marginal budget share of main consumer goods of rural residents in different income levels ; ( 2 ) the proportion of the basic demand quantity , the basic demand structure , the basic demand of main consumer goods in real expenditure of livelihood consumption ; ( 3 ) the income elasticity of demand , the expenditure elasticity of consumption , the price elasticity of demand and the cross price elasticity of demand of main consumer goods ; finally , came the following conclusions : 1 故本論文采用對擴展的線性支出系統(tǒng)進(jìn)行再擴展,即將上述假定改為: “對某類消費品的邊際預(yù)算份額或邊際消費傾向,對于同一收入等級的所有消費者均相同,但對于不同收入等級的消費者則有可能不同。 ”并通過定義和在模型中引入收入等級虛變量,借以代表與基準(zhǔn)的收入等級相比,消費者(農(nóng)民)僅僅由于其所處的收入等級變化所導(dǎo)致的邊際消費傾向的變化量。本論文采用對擴展的eles模型的再擴展,利用遼寧省統(tǒng)計局農(nóng)調(diào)總隊的2001年農(nóng)村住戶調(diào)查分戶資料(共1890戶) ,計算了( 1 )不同收入等級農(nóng)民對各主要類型消費品的邊際消費傾向、實際支出結(jié)構(gòu)、實際消費傾向、邊際預(yù)算份額; ( 2 )不同收入等級農(nóng)民對各主要類型消費品的基本需求量、基本需求結(jié)構(gòu)、基本需求占實際生活消費支出比重; ( 3 )不同收入等級農(nóng)民對各主要類摘要型消費品的需求收入彈性、消費支出彈性、需求自價格彈性、需求的交叉價格彈性。
百科解釋
In economics, income elasticity of demand measures the responsiveness of the demand for a good to a change in the income of the people demanding the good, ceteris paribus. It is calculated as the ratio of the percentage change in demand to the percentage change in income.